top of page
Image by Alexander Londoño
SpeakEasy_white_font_edited.png
YOUTH MAG
TALK FREELY,
EXPLORE BOLDLY

GRANDE KIMI: P19 → P1

  • Writer: Romy Kraus
    Romy Kraus
  • 1 hour ago
  • 7 min read

Sixty years after Ludovico Scarfiotti, Kimi Antonelli gave Italy another home winner in Monza, just not in a Ferrari.



Kimi Antonelli started 19th after taking an engine penalty and ended a 60-year Italian wait for victory at the Temple of Speed. But behind the homecoming was something more revealing: Mercedes thought some of the cars ahead would be difficult to pass. Kimi passed them anyway.


Kimi Antonelli started Monza in 19th. By the end of the first phase of the race, he had already gained seven places. Then came a red flag, a strategy reset, another charge through the field, a Virtual Safety Car, another pit stop and another collection of cars to pass.

The last one was his teammate. With three laps remaining, Antonelli caught and passed George Russell for the lead. A few minutes later, the Italian crossed the line first at the Italian Grand Prix.


P19 → P1.

The first Italian to win his home Grand Prix since Ludovico Scarfiotti in 1966.

Sixty years of waiting, ended by a 20-year-old from Bologna driving a Mercedes.

There is a lovely awkwardness to that last detail. Monza is Ferrari country. Red flags, red shirts, red smoke. Italian motorsport identity and Ferrari have been tangled together here for generations.

And yet the Italian who finally gave Italy another home winner did it in a Silver Arrow.

Grande Kimi, indeed.


FACTS & FIGURES: THE TACTICAL LOWDOWN

  • Kimi Antonelli started P19 and won the Italian Grand Prix.

  • He gained seven positions before the early red flag, moving to P12.

  • Antonelli started on the Hard tyre, switching to Mediums under the lap-four red flag.

  • A mid-race Virtual Safety Car allowed Mercedes to stop him again for fresh Mediums on lap 28.

  • He rejoined P6 and charged back through the cars ahead.

  • Mercedes admitted Antonelli “carved past cars we thought he may struggle to pass.”

  • He caught teammate George Russell and passed him for the lead with three laps remaining.

  • Antonelli became the first Italian to win the Italian Grand Prix since Ludovico Scarfiotti in 1966.

  • The victory was the 50th F1 win by an Italian driver.

  • Mercedes finished 1–2, with Russell second.

  • It was Mercedes’ eighth Monza victory and its first at the circuit since 2018.

  • It was also Mercedes’ 250th Grand Prix victory as a power-unit manufacturer.

  • Antonelli left Monza leading Russell by 66 points in the Drivers’ Championship.

  • Mercedes leads the Constructors’ Championship by 122 points.

  • Antonelli also set the faster Mercedes lap: 1:23.504, compared with Russell’s 1:24.390.


“EVEN STARTING P19, I BELIEVED THAT THIS MIGHT BE POSSIBLE.”

This is probably the line that tells you most about Antonelli’s afternoon.

Not the emotion afterwards. The belief beforehand.

Because 19th on the grid usually changes the ambition. The driver at the back is expected to spend Sunday repairing what went wrong on Saturday. Antonelli apparently hadn’t accepted the downgrade.

“On the first start, I made up a lot of positions and then realised we would get another good chance to gain positions after the red flag.” — Kimi Antonelli

Seven of them were already gone before that red flag.P19 had become P12.

Comeback drives can sometimes be explained away by strategy, safety cars or being in a much faster car than everyone around you. Antonelli was doing the basic work before the race gave Mercedes any gifts. Overtake somebody. Find the next car. Repeat.


“KIMI’S DRIVE WAS METHODICAL FROM THE VERY START.”

P19 to P1 sounds chaotic. Toto Wolff saw something else.

“He kept his head down, took no risks on both starts and just one-by-one began picking off the cars ahead of him.” — Toto Wolff

Methodical is an unusual word for a charge from the back of an F1 grid. It’s also probably the most fitting. Young drivers arrive in Formula 1 with speed almost as a prerequisite. The more difficult question is what happens when speed meets urgency.

Home race. Championship lead. Nineteenth on the grid. Cars everywhere.

There were plenty of reasons for Antonelli to try to win the race in the first ten laps.

Instead, Mercedes saw somebody working through the field.



“I FELT THAT I HAD THE SPEED TO FIGHT FOR THE WIN.”

The early red flag changed the race. Antonelli had started on the Hard tyre. Under the stoppage, Mercedes switched him onto Mediums. Russell’s race was almost the reverse.

Starting P2 on Mediums, he moved onto the Hard tyre under the red flag and committed to the conventional one-stop strategy, with the intention of running to the finish. Russell led.

Antonelli kept coming.


“That gave us a good chance, and I felt that I had the speed to fight for the win.” — Kimi Antonelli

This is where the race stopped being a recovery drive and became something much more inconvenient for the other side of the Mercedes garage.

The guy who started 19th wasn’t trying to salvage fourth anymore.

He wanted the car in first.


“THE VIRTUAL SAFETY CAR WAS DEFINITELY A MOMENT WHERE THE RACE CHANGED.”

George Russell had done most things right. He started second. Ran at the front. Had the conventional strategy. And, importantly, was already there while Antonelli was still having to fight through traffic. Then the Virtual Safety Car arrived. Mercedes had a decision. Antonelli’s first set of Mediums was showing signs it might not survive until the finish. Stopping him again would give him fresh tyres, but surrender track position. Mercedes split its strategy.

Russell stayed out. Antonelli came in on lap 28 for another set of Mediums.

He emerged sixth.


“At the time, no one could have known what the right call was. The team chose to split strategy between the two cars and that was the best decision we could have made.” — George Russell

That’s Formula 1’s strange relationship with strategy. We tend to judge decisions backwards.

Win and it was genius. Lose and somebody on the pit wall got it wrong. At the moment Mercedes made the call, Andrew Shovlin admitted the opposite strategy actually appeared stronger.

“At that point, the one-stop looked like the slightly stronger strategy.” — Andrew Shovlin

Russell had the track position. Antonelli had the tyres.

Now somebody had to make Mercedes look clever.


“KIMI’S PACE REALLY MADE THE TWO-STOP WORK.”

This might be the most revealing sentence:

Not: the strategy won Kimi the race.

Kimi made the strategy work.

There’s a difference. Antonelli came out sixth and had to recover everything Mercedes had just deliberately surrendered. And even his own team wasn’t convinced all of those cars would be easy to clear.

“He carved past cars we thought he may struggle to pass.” — Andrew Shovlin

Formula 1 teams model almost everything. Tyre degradation. Pit-loss time. Traffic. Race pace. Overtaking difficulty. Antonelli began outperforming the assumptions.

Fresh Mediums helped, obviously. So did a Mercedes that Wolff described as comfortably quicker than the opposition. But the tyres still don’t make the pass.

The driver does. Soon the traffic was gone.

There was one Mercedes left.


“IT’S FRUSTRATING TO BE SO CLOSE TO VICTORY AND NOT TO ACHIEVE IT.”

The final obstacle was George Russell.

Which is where the fairytale gets more interesting. Because Russell isn’t merely Antonelli’s teammate. He’s second in the Drivers’ Championship. Russell had older Hard tyres. Antonelli had fresher Mediums. Russell was also dealing with vibrations from his front tyres in the closing stages, according to Mercedes. Antonelli closed the gap.

With three laps remaining, he passed Russell for the lead.


“We raced each other hard but always with respect, and it was good fun fighting wheel-to-wheel for the win.” — George Russell

That’s the healthy version of an intra-team championship fight.

But teammate relationships in Formula 1 are easy when one driver is clearly faster, clearly older, clearly learning or clearly out of championship contention.

Things become more human when both drivers want the same trophy.

Russell’s opening sentence after the race was refreshingly uncomplicated:

“It’s frustrating to be so close to victory and not to achieve it but that is racing sometimes.”

Of course it is frustrating.

It should be. Your teammate starting 19th and taking the victory you thought was yours isn’t the sort of thing elite racing drivers are genetically designed to enjoy.

Mercedes got its perfect Sunday: P1 and P2, clean racing and maximum points.

The fascinating question is how easy “always with respect” remains if these two keep arriving at the same corner with a championship between them.


“THIS IS A DAY THAT I WILL REMEMBER FOREVER.”

Then came the part bigger than Mercedes strategy.

Italy had been waiting since 1966. Ludovico Scarfiotti won at Monza that year for Ferrari. No Italian driver had won the Italian Grand Prix since. Until Antonelli.


“It is for sure the most special win of my career so far.” — Kimi Antonelli

The setting mattered. Monza doesn’t do subtle home support.

“It is the best podium of the season and to see the full pit straight packed with people cheering and showing their support was a dream.” — Kimi Antonelli

Sixty years is an extraordinary gap for a country with this relationship to Formula 1.

And Antonelli ended it in perhaps the least traditionally Italian way possible.

Not in Ferrari red. In Mercedes colours.

Sporting tribalism always feels permanent until somebody gives the crowd a sufficiently good reason to temporarily forget it. An Italian had won Monza again.



“WE CANNOT EXPECT THIS FORM TO CONTINUE INTO MADRID NEXT WEEK.”

And then, almost perfectly, Mercedes ruined its own party.

Andrew Shovlin’s post-race assessment contained the sentence every runaway narrative needs:

“We know that Monza is an outlier as a track though and we cannot expect this form to continue into Madrid next week.”

Because one extraordinary weekend creates a certain disease in sport: certainty.

One dominant race and the car is fixed. One historic comeback and the driver is unstoppable. One teammate battle and there’s a civil war coming. Mercedes isn’t claiming any of that.

The team knows its development programme is out of sync with its rivals. It knows Monza’s high-speed, low-downforce demands make it unusual. Madrid will ask different questions.

Monza proved what Antonelli could do with the package he had.

It didn’t guarantee he’ll always have that advantage.

Which makes what comes next considerably more interesting.


THE CHAMPIONSHIP PROBLEM

Antonelli leaves Italy 66 points ahead of Russell in the Drivers’ Championship.

Mercedes leaves 122 points clear in the Constructors’.

Those are comfortable numbers.

The human situation inside the team may become less comfortable.

Russell achieved 7 GP wins in 7 years in F1. Kimi achieved 7 wins in 1 season, so far.


WHAT’S NEXT?

Can Antonelli repeat this in Madrid?

Mercedes isn’t expecting Monza’s performance advantage to automatically transfer. Shovlin described the Italian circuit as an outlier and expects a much tougher fight next time.

How significant is the championship lead?

Antonelli is now 66 points ahead of Russell. At this stage of the season, that means every future Mercedes strategy call involving both cars will carry a little more weight.

What about Mercedes?

The Monza 1–2 extends its Constructors’ Championship advantage to 122 points and gives Mercedes its eighth victory at the circuit.

And Russell?

Still second in the championship. Still quick. Still Antonelli’s teammate.

Which may eventually be the interesting bit.

Because after Monza, the question isn’t whether Kimi Antonelli can win from the back.

It’s what Mercedes does when both sides of its garage believe they should be at the front.

 
 
bottom of page